Evolution and long­term respiratory sequelae after severe COVID-19 pneumonia: nitric oxide diffusion measurement value.

INTRODUCTION: There are no published studies assessing the evolution of combined determination of the lung diffusing capacity for both nitric oxide and carbon monoxide (DLNO and DLCO) 12 months after the discharge of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: Prospective cohort study which included patients who were assessed both 3 and 12 months after an episode of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Their clinical status, health condition, lung function testings (LFTs) results (spirometry, DLNO-DLCO analysis, and six-minute walk test), and chest X-ray/computed tomography scan images were compared. RESULTS: 194 patients, age 62 years (P25-75, 51.5-71), 59% men, completed the study. 17% required admission to the intensive care unit. An improvement in the patients' exercise tolerance, the extent of the areas of ground-glass opacity, and the LFTs between 3 and 12 months following their hospital discharge were found, but without a decrease in their degree of dyspnea or their self-perceived health condition. DLNO was the most significantly altered parameter at 12 months (19.3%). The improvement in DLNO-DLCO mainly occurred at the expense of the recovery of alveolar units and their vascular component, with the membrane factor only improving in patients with more severe infections. CONCLUSIONS: The combined measurement of DLNO-DLCO is the most sensitive LFT for the detection of the long-term sequelae of COVID-19 pneumonia and it explain better their pathophysiology.

Efectividad del suero salino hipertónico nebulizado en pacientes con hipersecreción bronquial / Effectiveness of nebulized hypertonic saline in patients with bronchial hypersecretion

Introducción: El suero salino hipertónico (SSH) nebulizado mejora la calidad de vida y reduce las exacerbaciones en pacientes con fibrosis quística. Se desconoce si ofrecería los mismos beneficios en otras patologías hipersecretoras.MétodosEstudio observacional retrospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes que superaron la prueba de tolerancia e iniciaron SSH al 5,8% con un año de seguimiento. Se cuantificaron parámetros clínicos y asistenciales en los años previo y posterior al inicio del tratamiento.ResultadosUn total de 101 pacientes, 60,4% mujeres, media de edad 65años (IC95%: 62,4-67,9): 82 (81,2%) bronquiectasias, 6 (5,9%) EPOC, 2 (2%) asma, 1 (1%) EPID y 10 (9,9%) otros. Se evidenció una reducción de la broncorrea (91,1% vs 75,2%), de las infecciones de repetición (57,4% vs 22,8%) y de los ciclos de antibioterapia (1,54 vs 0,55), así como un aumento del FEV1 (1.881ml vs 1.942ml) y una disminución de las asistencias a atención primaria (2,94 vs 1,1), de urgencias (0,36 vs 0,17) y de hospitalizaciones (0,17 vs 0,06). Setenta y tres pacientes (72,3%) presentaron una adecuada tolerancia.ConclusiónLa nebulización de SSH al 5,8% en pacientes con hipersecreción bronquial es segura y tiene un destacable impacto clínico y asistencial. (AU)

Introduction: Nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) improves quality of life and reduces exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. It is unknown if it would offer the same benefits in other hypersecretory pathologies.MethodsRetrospective observational study. Patients who passed the tolerance test and started HS 5.8% with one year of follow-up were included. Clinical and healthcare parameters were quantified in the year before and after the start of treatment.Results101 patients, 60.4% women, 65years (95%CI: 62.4-67.9): 82 (81.2%) bronchiectasis, 6 (5.9%) COPD, 2 (2%) asthma, 1 (1%) ILD, and 10 (9.9%) other causes. There was a reduction in bronchorrhea (91.1% vs 75.2%), recurrent infections (57.4% vs 22.8%) and cycles of antibiotic therapy (1.54 vs 0.55), as well as an increase in FEV1 (1881ml vs. 1942ml) and a decrease in visits to primary care (2.94 vs. 1.1), emergencies (0.36 vs. 0.17) and hospitalizations (0.17 vs. 0.17). 06). 73 patients (72.3%) presented an adequate tolerance.ConclusionNebulization of HS 5.8% in patients with bronchial hypersecretion is safe and has a remarkable clinical and healthcare impact. (AU)

[Effectiveness of nebulized hypertonic saline in patients with bronchial hypersecretion]. / Efectividad del suero salino hipertónico nebulizado en pacientes con hipersecreción bronquial.

INTRODUCTION: Nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) improves quality of life and reduces exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis. It is unknown if it would offer the same benefits in other hypersecretory pathologies. METHODS: Retrospective observational study. Patients who passed the tolerance test and started HS 5.8% with one year of follow-up were included. Clinical and healthcare parameters were quantified in the year before and after the start of treatment. RESULTS: 101 patients, 60.4% women, 65years (95%CI: 62.4-67.9): 82 (81.2%) bronchiectasis, 6 (5.9%) COPD, 2 (2%) asthma, 1 (1%) ILD, and 10 (9.9%) other causes. There was a reduction in bronchorrhea (91.1% vs 75.2%), recurrent infections (57.4% vs 22.8%) and cycles of antibiotic therapy (1.54 vs 0.55), as well as an increase in FEV1 (1881ml vs. 1942ml) and a decrease in visits to primary care (2.94 vs. 1.1), emergencies (0.36 vs. 0.17) and hospitalizations (0.17 vs. 0.17). 06). 73 patients (72.3%) presented an adequate tolerance. CONCLUSION: Nebulization of HS 5.8% in patients with bronchial hypersecretion is safe and has a remarkable clinical and healthcare impact.

The Diagnostic Contribution of Systematic Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Admitted to a Conventional Pulmonology Hospitalization Unit.

OBJECTIVE: Although the evidence to date remains limited, we hypothesized that performing protocolized lung ultrasound (LUS) in patients, admitted to a conventional pulmonology hospitalization unit, could improve diagnostic precision. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic contribution and changes in the treatments administered after performing a protocolized LUS in patients hospitalized in a Pulmonology Department ward. METHODOLOGY: This was a prospective, observational study, which included patients admitted from the Emergency Department to a conventional Pulmonology Department hospitalization unit, after first being evaluated by a pulmonologist. LUS was performed within the first 48 hours of admission. The diagnosis at the time of discharge was used as the reference diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were included in this study. The admitting diagnoses were the decompensation of an underlying obstructive disease in 60 patients (33.3%), respiratory infection in 93 (51.7%), pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) in 9 (5%), exacerbation of an interstitial lung disease in 14 (7.8%), and other causes in 4 cases (2.2%). Ultrasonography provided new information, unsuspected at the patient's admission, in 117 (65%) of the patients by capturing images suggestive of infection in 63 patients (35%), 1 new case of ILD, 23 (12.7%) cases of cardiogenic edema, and pleural pathology in 19 (10.5%), as well as two tumors and indirect data related to a PE. The use of LUS resulted in the decision to change the already established treatment in 17.2% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: LUS provided additive information in more than half of patients that ended up reclassifying or potentially changing diagnosis or treatment. Thus, including LUS in management algorithms could reduce the need for other complementary tests or unnecessary treatments.

[Lung Ultrasound to Predict Unfavorable Progress in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19]. / Predicción de evolución desfavorable en pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 mediante ecografía pulmonar.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic ultrasound has been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pulmonary involvement. Several scores for quantifying the degree of involvement have been described, although there is no evidence to show that they have any capacity for predicting unfavorable progress. METHODOLOGY: Prospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The sample was stratified according to clinical course, and patients requiring invasive or non-invasive respiratory support were classified as having unfavorable progress. Biomarkers were analyzed at admission and on the same day that thoracic ultrasound was performed. Prognostic scales were also determined at admission. The ultrasound score was obtained in 8 or 14 areas, depending on the patient's ability to sit. RESULTS: We included 44 patients, 13 (29,5%) of whom subsequently needed ventilatory support. Eight areas were explored in all patients and 14 areas in 35 (79.5%). The most affected areas were the posterior lower lobes. Significant differences were found between the 2 groups on the SOFA and quick SOFA multidimensional scales, and PCR and LDH on the same day as thoracic ultrasound, and the ultrasound scores. The best area under the ROC curve (AUC) was obtained with the 14-area score, with a result of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.75-0.99). Its sensitivity and specificity for a cut-off score of 13.5 were 100% and 61.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of scores to quantify lung involvement measured by thoracic ultrasound provides useful information, facilitating risk stratification in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Alterations in Respiratory Function Test Three Months after Hospitalisation for COVID-19 Pneumonia: Value of Determining Nitric Oxide Diffusion.

Three to four months after hospitalisation for COVID-19 pneumonia, the most frequently described alteration in respiratory function tests (RFTs) is decreased carbon monoxide transfer capacity (DLCO). METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study that included patients hospitalised because of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, three months after their discharge. A clinical evaluation, analytical parameters, chest X-ray, six-minute walk test, spirometry and DLCO-DLNO analysis were performed. Demographic variables, comorbidities, and variables related to the severity of the admission were recorded. RESULTS: Two hundred patients completed the study; 59.5% men, age 62 years, 15.5% admitted to the intensive care unit. The most frequent functional alteration, in 27% of patients, was in the DLCO-DLNO combination. This alteration was associated with age, male sex, degree of dyspnoea, poorer perception of health, and limited ability for physical effort. These patients also presented higher levels of D-Dimer and more residual radiological alterations. In 42% of the patients with diffusion alterations, only reduced DLNO was presented, along with lower D-Dimer levels and less capillary volume involvement. The severity of the process was associated with the reduction in DLCO-DLNO. CONCLUSIONS: The most sensitive RFT for the detection of the sequelae of COVID-19 pneumonia was the combined measurement of DLCO-DLNO and this factor was related to patient health status and their capacity for physical exertion. In 40% of these cases, there was only a reduction in DLNO, a finding that may indicate less pulmonary vascular involvement.

Validity of Lung Ultrasound: Is an Image Worth More Than a Thousand Sounds?

INTRODUCTION: There is debate as to whether lung-ultrasound (LUS) can replace lung-auscultation (LA) in the assessment of respiratory diseases. METHODOLOGY: The diagnostic validity, safety, and reliability of LA and LUS were analyzed in patients admitted in a pulmonary ward due to decompensated obstructive airway diseases, decompensated interstitial diseases, and pulmonary infections, in a prospective study. Standard formulas were used to calculate the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The interobserver agreement with respect to the LA and LUS findings was evaluated based on the Kappa coefficient (ᴋ). RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were studied. LUS was more sensitive than the LA in evaluating pulmonary infections (93.59% vs. 77.02%; p = 0.001) and more specifically in the case of decompensated obstructive airway diseases (95.6% vs. 19.10%; p = 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of LUS was also greater in the case of pulmonary infections (75.65% vs. 60.90%; p = 0.02). The sensitivity and specificity of the combination of LA and LUS was 95.95%, 50% in pulmonary infections, 76.19%, 100% in case of decompensated obstructive airway diseases, and (100%, 88.54%) in case of interstitial diseases. (ᴋ) was 0.71 for an A-pattern, 0.73 for pathological B-lines, 0.94 for condensations, 0.89 for pleural-effusion, 0.63 for wheezes, 0.38 for rhonchi, 0.68 for fine crackles, 0.18 for coarse crackles, and 0.29 for a normal LA. CONCLUSIONS: There is a greater interobserver agreement in the interpretation of LUS-findings compared to that of LA-noises, their combined use improves diagnostic performance in all diseases examined.

Predicción de evolución desfavorable en pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 mediante ecografía pulmonar / Lung Ultrasound to Predict Unfavorable Progress in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19

OBJETIVO: La ecografía torácica ha mostrado ser útil para el diagnóstico de la afectación pulmonar por COVID-19. Para cuantificar el grado de afectación se han descrito varias escalas, aunque no existe evidencia de si su determinación podría tener alguna capacidad predictiva de evolución desfavorable. METODOLOGÍA: Estudio prospectivo de cohortes en el que se incluyó a pacientes ingresados por COVID-19. La muestra se estratificó en función de la evolución clínica, considerándose desfavorable en los pacientes que precisaron soporte respiratorio invasivo o no invasivo. Se analizaron biomarcadores al ingreso y el mismo día de la ecografía torácica, así como las escalas pronósticas al ingreso. Según la posibilidad de sedestación o no, se aplicó clasificación ecográfica en 8 o 14 áreas. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a 44 pacientes, 13 (29,5%) con necesidad posterior de soporte ventilatorio. En todos se exploraron 8 áreas y en 35 (79,5%) las 14. Las zonas más afectadas fueron los lóbulos inferiores en la zona posterior. Se detectaron diferencias significativas entre los 2 grupos en las escalas multidimensionales SOFA y quick SOFA, la PCR y LDH del mismo día de la ecografía torácica y la puntuación de las escalas ecográficas. La mejor área bajo la curva ROC (AUC) se obtuvo con la escala de 14 áreas, que fue de 0,88 (IC 95%: 0,75-0,99). Su sensibilidad y especificidad para un punto de corte 13,5 fue del 100% y del 61,5%. CONCLUSIONES: El uso de escalas para cuantificar la afectación pulmonar mediante ecografía torácica proporciona información útil para facilitar la estratificación del riesgo en los pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic ultrasound has been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of COVID-19 pulmonary involvement. Several scores for quantifying the degree of involvement have been described, although there is no evidence to show that they have any capacity for predicting unfavorable progress. METHODOLOGY: Prospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The sample was stratified according to clinical course, and patients requiring invasive or non-invasive respiratory support were classified as having unfavorable progress. Biomarkers were analyzed at admission and on the same day that thoracic ultrasound was performed. Prognostic scales were also determined at admission. The ultrasound score was obtained in 8 or 14 areas, depending on the patient's ability to sit. RESULTS: We included 44 patients, 13 (29,5%) of whom subsequently needed ventilatory support. Eight areas were explored in all patients and 14 areas in 35 (79.5%). The most affected areas were the posterior lower lobes. Significant differences were found between the 2 groups on the SOFA and quick SOFA multidimensional scales, and PCR and LDH on the same day as thoracic ultrasound, and the ultrasound scores. The best area under the ROC curve (AUC) was obtained with the 14-area score, with a result of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.75-0.99). Its sensitivity and specificity for a cut-off score of 13.5 were 100% and 61.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of scores to quantify lung involvement measured by thoracic ultrasound provides useful information, facilitating risk stratification in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

Validation of the portable Air-Smart Spirometer.

BACKGROUND: The Air-Smart Spirometer is the first portable device accepted by the European Community (EC) that performs spirometric measurements by a turbine mechanism and displays the results on a smartphone or a tablet. METHODS: In this multicenter, descriptive and cross-sectional prospective study carried out in 2 hospital centers, we compare FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio measured with the Air Smart-Spirometer device and a conventional spirometer, and analyze the ability of this new portable device to detect obstructions. Patients were included for 2 consecutive months. We calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) and likelihood ratio (LR +, LR-) as well as the Kappa Index to evaluate the concordance between the two devices for the detection of obstruction. The agreement and relation between the values of FEV1 and FVC in absolute value and the FEV1/FVC ratio measured by both devices were analyzed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) respectively. RESULTS: 200 patients (100 from each center) were included with a mean age of 57 (± 14) years, 110 were men (55%). Obstruction was detected by conventional spirometry in 73 patients (40.1%). Using a FEV1/FVC ratio smaller than 0.7 to detect obstruction with the Air Smart-Spirometer, the kappa index was 0.88, sensitivity (90.4%), specificity (97.2%), PPV (95.7%), NPV (93.7%), positive likelihood ratio (32.29), and negative likelihood ratio (0.10). The ICC and r between FEV1, FVC, and FEV1 / FVC ratio measured by the Air Smart Spirometer and the conventional spirometer were all higher than 0.94. CONCLUSION: The Air-Smart Spirometer is a simple and very precise instrument for detecting obstructive airway diseases. It is easy to use, which could make it especially useful non-specialized care and in other areas.

Eosinófilos y corticoides inhalados en la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica / Eosinophils and Inhaled Corticosteroids in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

No disponible

Corticoides inhalados en enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica: algunas consideraciones / Inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Some considerations

No disponible

La excepción no confirma la regla / The exception does not prove the rule

No disponible

La excepción no confirma la regla: lecciones de la física / The Exception does not Prove the Rule: Lessons From Physics

No disponible

Estudio clínico y molecular de 4 casos de hipertensión pulmonar asociada a sarcoidosis / Clinical and Molecular Study of 4 Cases of Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Sarcoidosis

La sarcoidosis es una enfermedad pleomórfica que en ocasiones puede presentar hipertensión pulmonar (HP). Existe poca información sobre la asociación de estas 2 enfermedades, en muchos casos de pequeñas series de pacientes enviados para trasplante. Presentamos 4 casos con afectación pulmonar leve en los que se realizó cateterismo derecho y se utilizó tratamiento específico para HP. Tras consentimiento informado, se hizo un estudio genético que mostró mutaciones en genes relacionados con HP en 3 pacientes. Se trata del primer estudio que proporciona información genética en este tipo de HP

Sarcoidosis is a pleomorphic disease that can present with pulmonary hypertension (PH). What little information is available about the association of these two diseases comes mainly from small series of patients scheduled for transplant. We present 4 cases of mild pulmonary involvement in whom right catheterisation was performed and PH-specific therapy was administered. After obtaining written consent, a genetic study was performed that showed mutations in PH-related genes in 3 of the patients. This is the first study of its kind to yield genetic information for this type of PH

Clinical and molecular study of 4 cases of pulmonary hypertension associated with sarcoidosis.

Sarcoidosis is a pleomorphic disease that can present with pulmonary hypertension (PH). What little information is available about the association of these two diseases comes mainly from small series of patients scheduled for transplant. We present 4 cases of mild pulmonary involvement in whom right catheterisation was performed and PH-specific therapy was administered. After obtaining written consent, a genetic study was performed that showed mutations in PH-related genes in 3 of the patients. This is the first study of its kind to yield genetic information for this type of PH.